531 Responses to Playoff Game Day 2 – The Electric Boogaloo

1. philippinefan says:

   January 21, 2013 at 12:02 pm

   Ok Grumpy calling fer a 1 point Niner win 27-26. I have this stored on another computer and I’ll check the best call for the actual score in the Hawks game too Man
2. Spitblood says:

   January 21, 2013 at 12:23 pm

   I was thoroughly unimpressed with Tom Brady last night. His first run before the end of the half was terrible clock management, and his high leg kick was south of fish tacos. But the one thing I really thought was weak was Brady’s scramble to the left on fourth down and he had the first if he just tried (all he had to do was out-run Nata), but instead Brady decided to just throw it up into the end zone to Lloyd instead of risking his body. Come on, man. That was the AFC Championship. Show a desire to risk your body for your team.

   I keep getting fooled by the Patriots. They play the Jets, Dolphins and Bills twice a year. That inflates their status, and CBS blows so much sunshine up Brady’s arse, it’s hard not to listen and be influenced by it…. but no more. Welker’s never won a Super Bowl. Brady is a has been. The AFC is weak. That’s not to say we don’t have a fight on our hands in the Super Bowl, because we do. But I’m done with the Patriots’ bandwagon.
   • TOUCHDOWN TOMMY says:

     January 21, 2013 at 12:38 pm

     Spitblood

     You go on and on before every game and write a novel on your analysis of the game.
     Then we have to listen to a bunch of excuses on how you were fooled.
     You are the fool blowing the sunshine.
3. NoFear49er says:

   January 21, 2013 at 1:01 pm

   Says the guy with 25 screen names…

   Funny how the same assholes who never had a problem with name-calling and bashing anyone not in full-worship mode for Alex now demand everyone STFU about it or face the dreaded threat of banishment if Twinfan decides to put the hit out.
   • Spitblood says:

     January 21, 2013 at 1:11 pm

     Alex Smith does a great job holding a clip board….
   • twinfan1 says:

     January 21, 2013 at 1:12 pm

     Fear, I hear your block is next-they’re coming to ges your guns, Barbara..
4. twinfan1 says:

   January 21, 2013 at 1:19 pm

   I apologize, Spit and Fear. I forgot what a horrible day this is for you. A real daily double
   • Spitblood says:

     January 21, 2013 at 1:23 pm

     This is a great day. Colin Kaepernick is the next star in the NFL and he’s cemented Alex Smith’s journey out of SF. What’s not to like?
5. Grumpy Guy says:

   January 21, 2013 at 1:25 pm

   So… is it psychotic venom time, then?

   
   • twinfan1 says:

     January 21, 2013 at 1:35 pm

     Nah, that was yesterday, Moms dying horrible deaths from cancer, Crabs raping the shit out of that girl… or is that good ole fashioned football talk? Sophisticated humor?
6. Grumpy Guy says:

   January 21, 2013 at 1:30 pm

   Or if prefer this one…
   • unca_chuck says:

     January 21, 2013 at 1:44 pm

     Yer killin’ me Grump. Sadly, I remember when this somg came out. ’75? ’76?

     NoFear, Twin decides nothing here. I do. Assholes are banned. You and your consipracy theories are fine and dandy, but don’t pretend that Twin pulls the levers. Or pretend away. I could give a fuck.
7. twinfan1 says:

   January 21, 2013 at 1:58 pm

   With a few notable exceptions, the comments yesterday were cordial enough., although it’s always amusing to see the idiots bailing on their team as soon as things go poorly. But you folks need to call out this crap like the Aker’s comment from the site mascot. Even Chuck congratulated the fan who stabbed a guy.
   And Fear- leave your paranoia in Room B. I don’t control anything here. It’s allllllll Chuck.
   • NoFear49er says:

     January 21, 2013 at 2:10 pm

     fan1, it’s just a little difficult to not notice you call for Chuck to muzzle Spitblood and then he threatens to ban him. But whatever, it’s not my concern who dances to whose tune, just the idea that you like to be a bully then hide behind Chuck’s skirt that bothers me I suppose.
8. philippinefan says:

   January 21, 2013 at 1:58 pm

   The symptoms of psychotic venom are coming, beware. Me I prefer the good old fashioned dementia love fest myself
   • Alleykat says:

     January 21, 2013 at 2:08 pm

     You like my old quote about “Dementia Love Fest”
     Huh Phil…I love it too for this zoo.
   • Nipper says:

     January 21, 2013 at 2:52 pm

     It’s so nice to be friendly.
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 3:22 pm

       Really? Huh. Maybe I’ll try it next lifetime.
9. NoFear49er says:

   January 21, 2013 at 2:05 pm

   fan1, next you’ll be saying how happy you are that Kaep is the quarterback Alex never was. Alex is happy, too. He might be negotiating his next contract with a ring he never would have had he not been benched, “through no fault of his own” except for the minor problem of not being a very good pro QB. Before you tell everyone to SFTU about Alex maybe a little humble pie is in order. As hard as you try to blow your own horn, your opinion stinks as much, if not more, as anyone’s.

   On the guns, it makes about as much sense as anything the Kenyan’s done. All show, no go. Let’s make a big deal about banning the weapons responsible for less death than fists. Make it “for the children” like Hitler wrote. And let the insane wackos carrying the water in the school system suspending kindergarteners for two weeks for threating to shoot another kid with a plastic toy bubble gun. That’ll fix it.
   • twinfan1 says:

     January 21, 2013 at 2:34 pm

     As I said, that Alex was even in the league last year and in the NFC title game makes you and your wacko kind dead wrong about him. As far as your Chuckie paranoia, you don’t pay attention- I get more shit from him than even the worst of the bigots that apparently rule here. So yeah, Spit should SFTU as should anyone who can say “I hope Crabs raped the shit outta that woman and got his money’s worth”..THAT’s the crap that rules here…
     The stuff you love.
   • twinfan1 says:

     January 21, 2013 at 2:50 pm

     And check your time line,moron. Chuck threatened to ban Spittle Saturday before I posted anything. And he should have.
     • Nipper says:

       January 21, 2013 at 2:53 pm

       fight?
     • NoFear49er says:

       January 21, 2013 at 3:04 pm

       twinfan1 says:

       January 17, 2013 at 9:05 pm

       Chuckles, try to control Spit.
       If this guy is going to start again, you miight as well blow up your blog now. Handle him before it get’s out of hand.Please.

       ‘Nuff said.
     • twinfan1 says:

       January 21, 2013 at 3:52 pm

       Yeah, I did forget that I was pissed that your slimeball buddy was going at it again. You fucks should not be welcome in this country, let alone this blog.
     • twinfan1 says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:02 pm

       A 30.06 can down a fucking elephant. What do you need an assault weapon for? How many rounds you need in your clip? That’s mighty fucking suspicious I’d say anyone who wants the right to an assault weapon *should* have their guns seized. .
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:05 pm

       Fortunately, our Founding Fathers and the Constitution says otherwise. And said opinion has been upheld by the Supreme Court.
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:09 pm

       Also, if it’s a .30-06 it sure as hell ain’t an “assault weapon”. Assault rifles use smaller rounds so as to controllable on full auto.

       And.

       http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/09/the-ar-15-you-dont-need-one-and-they-are-too-dangerous-to-own
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:14 pm

       And.

       “Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment. We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.”
     • twinfan1 says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:21 pm

       I never said a 30.06 is an assault weapon, the point was that idiot shouldn’t need an aasault weapon to go hunting. If he’s hunting animals, that is..And the Supreme Court decision appears perfectly consistent with many of the policy options being discussed after the shootings in Newtown, Conn.
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:23 pm

       There is no legal reason why all firearms *should* be for hunting. Those who founded the country absolutely recognized the need for weapons for self defense. Perhaps you think you know better than they did. You will find less than universal agreement with that premise, however.
     • twinfan1 says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:29 pm

       GG has selected one passage in the decision. Probably the only he’s read, to be kind to him.
       “”We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller (an earlier case) said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected
     • twinfan1 says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:34 pm

       They’ve upheld the right to posess a gun in your home for self protection. Besides what I noted above, there are many restrictions in the ruling. But hey, let’s have a look at what the wackos like Fear REALLY think
     • NoFear49er says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:35 pm

       Hey Grumpy,

       You’re on a roll, a sometimes side-splitting role at that.

       But on the caliber, the weight of the ammo has more to do with it. Because if you’re in need of an actual assault weapon you’ll need plenty. I remember having brought a BAR on a few jaunts across the fence and that I was glad to be humping the gun and not the ammo. I liked that old WWII grease gun, too.

       Even the AR-15s’ .223 ammo added up when you had to choose between rice and more than the 14 mags in the standard load.

       Any of it doesn’t matter much because the second amendment was never about hunting or what some nutcase decides you need to defend yourself.
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:42 pm

       Understood NoFear. Getting into different loads and ammo is a level of complexity that some folks are just not going to be able to follow.

       This is interesting too:

       Comment by Don Kates
       Kates is recognized as one of the
       to Second Amendment authorities
       http://michellawyers.com/attorney-profile/don-b-kates/

       My friend Jim Wolfe has written me asking my opinion of an article
       by someone named Thom Hartmann who thinks the Second Amendment was
       invented by Southern slave- holders to allow them to arm militias to
       suppress slave revolts.

       Google informs me that Mr. Hartmann’s historical expertise consists
       in his being a radio talk show host. His comments on the Second
       Amendment represent a new apex in historical ignorance. Our Founding
       Fathers believed in the importance of everyone having access to arms
       because that was a mainstay of liberal political philosophy in the 18th
       Century. The Founders views on the value of the right to arms began with
       Aristotle whom they revered as the font of liberal political thought.
       [For instance, Aristotle, POLITICS 218 (J. Sinclair trans., 1962): free
       government exalts an armed people, but oligarchies and tyrants “mistrust
       the people and therefore deprive them of their arms.”] It is perhaps
       necessary to inform Mr. Hartmann that Aristotle was not an 18th Century
       American southerner.

       The same view was enunciated by Englishmen up to and including Sir
       Walter Raleigh who asserted that a tyrant acts “To unarm his people, and
       store up their weapons, under pretense of keeping them safe….” [8 W.
       Raleigh, THE WORKS OF SIR WALTER RALEIGH, KT., NOW FIRST COLLECTED 22
       (Oxford, 1829).] For Mr. Hartmann’s benefit, let me point out that
       Raleigh’s comments pre-dated American slavery. Indeed they
       predated English settlements in America.

       A modern historian notes that “Renaissance theorists as dissimilar
       as Nicholas Macchiavelli and Sir Thomas Moore, Thomas Hobbes and James
       Harrington [shared] a consensus that only men willing and able to defend
       themselves could possibly preserve their liberties.”; [and that] the
       theme of arms possession as both the hallmark and the ultimate guarantee
       of personal liberty appears equally in the writings of Cicero, Locke and
       Trenchard.”

       Statements lauding the right to arms and popular possession of arms
       as basic to free government were common to the liberal
       political philosophers known to the Founders e.g., Grotius, Locke,
       Montesquieu, Blackstone, DeLolme and Beccaria, among many others. For
       Mr. Hartmann’s benefit I should point out that none of these European
       philosophers were slave-holders – or Southerners or even Americans.
       Grotius was a 17th Century Dutchman, Locke was a 17th-18th Century
       Englishman, Montesquieu and DeLolme were 18th Century Frenchman,
       Blackstone was an 18th Century Englishman and Beccaria was an 18th
       Century Italian. None of their pronouncements were focused on America
       nor did they have any interest in defending slavery in America or
       elsewhere. What they said about the importance of everyone having access
       to arms were virtual truisms to the liberal philosophers of their era.

       Now lets talk about American advocates of the right to arms. For the
       Founding Fathers and the philosophers they revered, the right of
       ordinary people to arms was a precept of liberal political thought.1 A
       comment by an anonymous late 18th Century American expresses what
       appears to have been a well nigh universal 18th Century American view:
       In free governments “there is not the slightest difficulty or jealousy
       about putting arms into the hands of every man in the country.”2

       A recently published 300+ page volume offers scores of such quotes from
       statesmen of every important segment of late 18th Century American
       opinion – from North and South akike.3 [Stephen Halbrook, THE FOUNDERS’
       SECOND AMENDMENT: ORIGINS OF THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS] A few examples:

       JOEL BARLOW a late 18th Century American poet and diplomat from
       Connecticut published a pamphlet which was among the earliest works
       arguing for abolition of slavery. He also wrote a pamphlet lecturing
       Europeans on how and why a free society like America encouraged its
       people to be armed.

       THOMAS JEFFERSON’s model for a state constitution guaranteed: “No free
       man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”4 Of course he was a
       Southern slave holder, but if that was a factor in Jefferson’s advocacy
       of an armed society he forgot to mention it.

       ROGER SHERMAN endorsed “the privilege of every citizen, and one of his
       most essential rights, to bear arms, and to resist every attack on his
       liberty and property, by whomsoever made.”5 Sherman, who was not a
       slaveholder, was from Connecticut which he represented in the Senate
       until his death in 1791.

       JAMES MADISON, assured Americans that they could not be tyrannized by
       the new federal government “because of the advantage of being armed,
       which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other
       nation.”6 Madison was a Southerner but his endorsement of an armed
       people was a truism among 18th Century American whether slave-holders or
       not.

       SAM ADAMS proposed an alternative guarantee of the right to arms: “the
       said constitution [shall] be never construed … to prevent the people
       of the United States who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own
       arms.”7 Adams, who was not a slaveholder, was from Massachusetts.

       THOMAS PAINE asserted that “arms like laws discourage and keep the
       invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order in the world…. Horrid
       mischief would ensue were [the good] deprived of the use of them… the
       weak will become a prey to the strong.”8 Paine, who was not a
       slaveholder, was an English immigrant who settled in Pennsylvania and
       later in N.Y.

       JOSEPH STORY summarized the views of late 18th Century Americans like
       himself: “one of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their
       purpose without resistance is, by disarming the people and making it an
       offense to keep arms.” Story, who was not a slaveholder, was from
       Massachusetts.

       NOAH WEBSTER, who also expressed such sentiments was neither a
       slaveholder nor a southerner. He was from Connecticut.

       TENCH COXE who expressed such sentiment, was not a slaveholder. He was
       from Pennsylvania.
     • twinfan1 says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:43 pm

       My 4:29 was incomplete. The ruling said “We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller (an earlier case) said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time.'”
     • NoFear49er says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:46 pm

       Why would you try to associate me with your idiot’s video fan1?

       Do you think we require more proof that you’re a despicable liar?
     • Grumpy Guy says:

       January 21, 2013 at 4:49 pm

       And as for the Sandy Hook conspiracy, there are loads of wackos who believe things like this on both sides of the political spectrum. The Truthers and the nutjobs who think the government killed JFK and the ones who think that the government invented crack.

       The ravings of lunatics should not be used to smear the beliefs of everyone who disagrees with us.
   • Grumpy Guy says:

     January 21, 2013 at 5:06 pm

     Full text of Heller here.

     Click to access 07-290.pdf

     Clearly disallowing handgun bans or trigger lock requirements.
10. unca_chuck says:

    January 21, 2013 at 2:53 pm

    YEah, there’s that. Plus, I think Spitty can fight his own battled
11. twinfan1 says:

    January 21, 2013 at 2:59 pm

    Spittle, Fear, Denny, the guy who posted about “nigger cock”:those dudes stick together.
    • Spitblood says:

      January 21, 2013 at 3:06 pm

      Twin…. Just admit it: You’re an Alex Smith lovin’ fool and you don’t know good qb play.
      • twinfan1 says:

        January 21, 2013 at 3:37 pm

        I’ve enjoyed Colin’s play, and posted that numerous times, well. dozens of times. You’re the dumb fuck who had to start in on Smith. I’d explain how it’s possible for a reasonable and sane person to appreciate Colin’s play and also appreciate Smith . I was wrong about my initial evalaution of Kap. I’m not wrong about Alex.
        And he’ll make out just fine. You won’t.
    • NoFear49er says:

      January 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm

      Chuckles, try to control fan1. If this guy is going to start again, you might as well blow up your blog now. Handle him before it gets out of hand. Please.
    • twinfan1 says:

      January 21, 2013 at 3:20 pm

      Banning Spittle was a good idea then, a better idea now.
12. Winder says:

    January 21, 2013 at 3:15 pm

    I’m to happy to get upset right now. Lately, when people become pests i just plug in my 2012 SF Giants World Series video and think about how much the Dogders have spent trying to be where we are. Hopefully, in about 2 1/2 weeks I will be able to plug in my Super Bowl 47 Champions: San Francisco 49ers DVD.
    .
    This blog is a wonderful place for all 49er fans, even the phsycotic ones(like me on certain days).
13. Grumpy Guy says:

    January 21, 2013 at 3:26 pm

    But if we ban all the crazy people here, they’ll be no one to read Chuck’s blog.
14. Grumpy Guy says:

    January 21, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    58% of my multiple personalities want to ban Twinfan. Unfortunately for them they don’t yet have a supermajority. The odd thing is, 2% of them actually like Twinfan. I don’t know what is wrong with those guys. Probably not right in the head or something.
15. twinfan1 says:

    January 21, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    What percent of you wants to be ban a guy who compares our President to a Hitler, or a guy who says he hopes Crabs “raped the shit out of that woman”? Or that Aker’s MOM should die of stomach cancer? Just wondering…. 1%? What percent of you agrees with that shit? What percent is a an apologist for it?
    • Grumpy Guy says:

      January 21, 2013 at 3:57 pm

      33% want to execute all Godwinners. 27% think you are Hitler. 97% want to castrate all rapists. 88% feel sorry for Dennis. 93% feel sorry for you. 17% want to go have a cookie. 79% want to go have a shot of tequila. And 98% hate people who ask stupid questions about people on the internet. But 2% still think you’re just peachy.

      — Not a scientific Gallup poll. Questions annoyed 143 of my multiple personalities. Margin of error +/- 93 percent.
16. twinfan1 says:

    January 21, 2013 at 4:11 pm

    I think the Kenyan and I are going to take your water pistol when we Muslims finish our job here.
    • Grumpy Guy says:

      January 21, 2013 at 4:15 pm

      Me or NoFear?

      ‘Cause I actually do not own one.
      • twinfan1 says:

        January 21, 2013 at 4:48 pm

        No water pistol? Fear is getting guns, sharp objects, stones seized .. and having his fingernails clipped.
      • Grumpy Guy says:

        January 21, 2013 at 5:07 pm

        No pistol or gun of any sort, actually. I choose not to exercise the right. I do not, however, renounce the right.
17. twinfan1 says:

    January 21, 2013 at 4:58 pm

    The meaning of the Heller decision is widely disputed by legal scholars. The only thing agreed upon is that it’s ambiguous.
18. unca_chuck says:

    January 21, 2013 at 9:15 pm

    I see all is fine in the nut house.

    Carry on folks . . . I like you keeping it on the back pages.
    • Grumpy Guy says:

      January 21, 2013 at 9:29 pm

      Never a dull moment in the asylum. And popcorn sales are off the fucking hook!

Comments are closed.